Categorías
How to write fiction

Storytelling to have them wrapped around your finger p2



photo of woman reading a story to her child
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

Hi, today to nonsense again about crime… the crime of writing a superb hero’s journey to get the audience wrapped around your finger by finding the clues and witness who might prove your product/service is the best out there. It applies to plot too.


THE EVIDENCE

Maybe you don’t know, since you probably studied something else and Literature doesn’t include marketing. It might include communication but not marketing. Anyone who has studied a little of marketing knows.



WE NEVER BUY STUFF AS A RESULT OF KNOWING THE RATIONAL FACTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT. We buy because of our feelings… Eh. Fears.



But we can make the facts to look like emotional reasons why to buy by transforming them into a key to have an epiphany.

The webinarist explains that the trials and tribulations and meetings (the first encounters with the minions or the companions) that have solved the problem, act like a «proof» in the sense of «witnessing». Thus, the audience witness the way the product solves the problem. This sounds a lot like showing, not telling. Because we won’t tell the audience what the problem is. Like a Maruchan advertisement in which a person talks and talks and talks and in order to get them quiet, the antagonist gives them some Maruchan. Voilà, the problem of getting peace is solved. But nobody says so. It is there, but nobody will tell what the problem is.

OF THE PROOFS.

Proof is a rather complicated case in traditional storytelling. There can’t be minus than three trials; yet the webinarist reduces them to two. Since the evidence sum into the already orchestrated chain of unresolved trouble that has been tackled by the product, I guess that makes it three but I understand he reduces them because of screen time prices.

In the case of Link, the trials can’t be reduced to two nor three. The whole videogame is a series of challenges to be conquered, the way RPG are designed to be solved and fought. Nonetheless, we can talk of two really important tasks: Epona and the dark Link.

Without Epona, the second companion, we won’t be able to move around Hyrule. This trial is so the hero can tame not just the wild horse but Time as well.

The dark Link means to conquer fear. We all have to tame our dark side if we’re to live. Life is not just a series of pleasant happenings. It has disgrace and misery too. Such are the dark times and feelings we need to defeat before we go onto the big journey of the day. Remember, for the journey to be meaningful (the one of the hero), the problems have to escalate as much as possible in strength and size. The worst things go, the better the ending.

If an exam is what’s making our common heroine to shiver; we have her expulsed from the library together with the handsome ________ (boy, girl, alien; suit yourself) in a tight T-shirt. Eyes stray and the study book becomes boring. But here comes the super fun app to the rescue… I’m explaining how to use storytelling to sell. Something I’m unable to just because I’m lazy. A lot lazy.

Escalating a plot is similar to getting COVID-19 after the H1N1 (which is almost as bad). Yes, I know. COVID made things look as blue as the lack of oxygen but it is the most real thing of anything really bad happening for most of us. I bet that you’re reading this from some country without war, famine or sickness… We have just lived the last. Do you get it? It has to be really really bad for it to cause feelings. Nonetheless, the problem can’t be the same or have the same solution. If it is I can guarantee the novel flying away or lost in the subway/bus and people fast forwarding the advertisement. Why do you think people send Co…la advertisements to each other in IG? Because they’re well done and have a nice plot.

Next entry will deal with encounters. We can’t have a real hero journey or quest without meeting allies or minions!

Categorías
Lunes de patchwork: SNS y escribir

Just a story?

Categorías
Sunday word hunter: poetry and nonsense To beloved ones

Looking back

crop faceless couple holding hands on balcony
Photo by Anete Lusina on Pexels.com



From the mirror,
Water from the sky,
Wrinkles and spots hidden to sight.
A puddle can’t be so true, after all.
It’s me and blue, white, blue behind.

No one else but the ripples of time.
No one else but my eyes looking back.
I grew up fond of me.
And the reflection did so too.
I’ll sing I’m alive.
On my own.
Maybe the cat.

Categorías
Cómo escribir ficción

¿De dónde dem&%#$ salen los focalizadores en narratología?




white and black map
Photo by Gül Işık on Pexels.com

Dentro del capitulo sobre focalizadores de la Introducción a la narratología de Mieke Bal, hay una sección final donde explica los orígenes y las fuentes de varios de los conceptos narratológicos, en particular las razones por las que decide tomar como punto de partida la información que se le presenta al lector y la manipulación que se hace de esa información como parte de las características del texto narrativo.

En opinión de ella, el análisis del texto narrativo debe partir desde un sistema para poder tener una teoría. Y esto es porque han existido varias «teorías de la novela» a lo largo del tiempo y el espacio. Muchas de ellas con enfoques diferentes hacia la misma cosa… También nombra a un montón de autores que se dedicaron a intentar establecer reglas para el estudio del texto narrativo. Ya sea desde las relaciones temporales o desde el punto de vista (muy curiosamente en los países anglosajones donde el head hopping se considera un defecto del texto narrativo y se desaconseja usarlo).

Eso hasta 1972 cuando Genette (mundialmente conocido por todo el mundo menos por mí pero igual eso es porque este libro es una «introducción») en su Discours du récit, intenta darle pies y cabeza a todo eso vinculando aspectos temporales y usando, por primera vez, la idea de la focalización.

Claro que, usando términos griegos. Que como dice Diana Uribe, historiadora colombiana; no es que sean cosas del otro mundo, son simples palabras para describir. El problema es que están en griego y por lo tanto resulta complicado entenderlas. Y es que como la ciencia parte de las preguntas sobre el ser que se inventaron en Grecia, pues es normal que todos los que quieren elaborar teorías sobre algo, quieran usar las mismas palabras que las otras ciencias…

Todo el sistema de Genette usa cosas como ana «hacia/desde atrás» y pro «hacia/adelante«. Lipsis «dejar algo fuera» y lepsis «añadir algo”. Con Para como «de lado«. Con lo que paralipsis se vuelve «dejar de lado o dejar fuera». Estas palabrotas griegas son las que no consigo aprenderme y las que le dan cuerpo al análisis de textos y a muchas otras situaciones científicas o filosóficas.

Otros autores que Mieke considera interesantes o pertinentes porque los ha usado para exponer como analizar textos son Hamon, Bachelard, Uspenski y Booth. Bachelard me suena particularmente atractivo porque se dedicó al espacio (Poetics of space). Fuera de esta justificación o mención de fuentes; el apartado no posee ninguna información relevante.

¿Un reporte de lectura algo pequeño, verdad?

Y para que las chorradas sigan existiendo, dale like a ésta si te gustó. Suscríbete sí tienes ganas de ver cosas muy pero muy extrañas y deja algún comentario en el buzón por si quieres contribuir con algo divertido, ocioso o simplemente decir hola.

Pasto kalo.  

Categorías
How to write fiction

Storytelling to have them wrapped around your finger p1


photo of woman reading a story to her child
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com


Since the last translation, I changed a little the title to keep interest… Yeah, if there can be one or two interested readers. 

Otherwise, the entry would simply have the same name with some «p» for «part» attached. I’m still nonsensing on how the non writers are learning how to write to make people fall in love with their product’s and services. Thus, here I am, nonsensing about storytelling.

THE BEGINNING OF THE JOURNEY

The journey does start. We need to explore the possibilities from the spark.

We need to get to the moment when the production or service saved us from an everyday need but we still have to start somewhere.

Similarly, Link begins his journey in the Kokiri forest, where I think I remember he is taught how to play the ocarine by Zelda. Anyways, he starts in the forest, the pure place of spirits.

Our normal character (as in the everyday person to be saved by said product/service) starts an exceptional day (thus of normal everyday person the character has nothing). And likewise he/she has to fight the odds: reading books and listening to webinars, learning code, spent the whole night studying to Red Bull and aspirin.

These difficulties will make it more believable and relatable. And they have to be there. The thing of selling is to make the audience believe we are solving their problems. We offer the best books and webinars with a certificate that will guarantee a job. A fast and easy way to learn code… An energetic drink to study the whole night without falling asleep. Sleep is needed and magical ways don’t exist. There are tools but I prefer the tool of my own mind.

Next entry will deal with evidence and following the suspect… Ah! , this is about the hero’s journey and not a black novel. Next time… evidence and witnessing, the storytelling has to prove the service/product solves the problem. And the sentence still sounds like I’ll write about crime.

Categorías
Lunes de patchwork: SNS y escribir

Spanglish

http://www.ub.edu/diccionarilinguistica/print/350

Categorías
Sunday word hunter: poetry and nonsense To beloved ones

Creer

crop faceless couple holding hands on balcony
Photo by Anete Lusina on Pexels.com



Mierda.
Otra vez,
Solo con ser.
Y la peor persona con quién importa.
¿Qué hice?
Creer.

Categorías
Cómo escribir ficción

Una guía rápida para crear suspenso con focalizadores

woman wearing black shirt taking picture of flowers on top of table
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

 Hola. Esta entrada es un resumen de otras entradas sobre focalizadores y la estoy escribiendo como una ficha de información para los que no tienen tiempo para leer chorradas. No hay nada nuevo con respecto a lo que ya he escrito sobre focalizadores. Y aquí comienza la ficha.Entre las cosas de la narratología, el análisis del texto para definir si este es narrativo, nos encontramos con que la manipulación de la información a la que tiene acceso el lector en comparación con lo que sabe el personaje principal; nos dará como resultado un grado de suspenso. El POV, que es lo que manipula el grado de acceso a la información, en narratología se maneja como focalizador, ya que la voz narrativa no siempre coincide con el “punto de vista” a través del cual se nos describe o narran las acciones de los personajes. Ejemplo: “Leila lo descubrió mirándola con ojos hambrientos”. ¿Quién ve a Leila descubriendo? ¿Por qué no usar una voz en primera persona? ¿Por qué esta voz en tercera persona tiene el mismo efecto que usar una voz en primera persona? ¿Por qué decirnos que Leila descubrió algo? El grado o género de suspenso que podemos generar manipulando la información se deriva como lo muestra la tabla[1]

 

 

Género o especie de suspenso

El lector sabe

menos

que el personaje, que sabe igualmente

nada

Rompecabezas, novela policiaca, búsqueda.

El lector sabe

más

que el personaje, que sabe

menos

Amenaza o terror

El lector sabe

menos

que el personaje, que sabe

menos

Secreto o thriller

El lector sabe

más

que el personaje, que sabe igualmente

lo mismo

NO HAY SUSPENSO

 


[1] Esta tabla es una modificación de la tabla que se puede encontrar en Introducción a la narratología de Mieke Bal.

Categorías
Cómo escribir ficción

Storytelling, how to make a reader to fall in love p2



CONTINUATION ABOUT A HERO’S JOURNEY AND MORE NONSENSE

We can use both ideas, the chosen hero and the everyday hero. The thing is that, if we choose the chosen one strategy, it is forbidden to enounce «it has to be you». We need to force our heroine to do it but never say it. If you do, if you use the pointing finger; a more experienced reader will abandon your piece. Think Frodo. No one said he had to do it. He just realized no one else could. It was too much temptation to the men. Too onerous for the elves. And too dangerous for them all if Gandalf did.

On the other side, the side of the «everyday person» hero; they are not heroic in the same way. They are heroic by solving an everyday small calamity. They face things like webservers disappearing, video rendering melting away to a broken memory card, a problem in Excel, decide where to eat, how to quench thirst in hell (temperatures over the 35°C[1] and we know as plot. For the plot is bullying our character. Yes, we bully our character. And readers do enjoy it no matter how much they protest.

AN EXCEPTIONAL DAY

See? No matter how common the problem, we won’t use a typical day as reference.

In the video, the normal average Joe discovers the product/service/ company as salvation… I mean as the magical object. Link is given an Ocarine to travel time; we’re given a good smelling fabric softener to fend off the dull day.

Merriam discovers she loves writing and she meets WordPress (this is not advertising, if anyone proves other platform even better I’ll move ASAP) and the epiphany echoes the skies. Truth is, it was the first time I saved money to buy something I had reflected on. And of waiting to see if the idea was still there by the time I had collected the money. I also had that time you think what the heck was I good at. I could only think I love reading and hoarding plots… And this I wasn’t supposed to tell you.



To summarize. That day in the life of our common hero, he has to be inspired by lighting; the lettuce may be or something that breaks that mediocrity of everyday. Magic happens then and there. In a discreet way.



And since magic runs out, it is time to shut up my thumbs on the phone’s screen. It’s time to go see what’s in the inexistent fridge to gulp down or take a nap.

Would you like to re charge my magical counter by giving some love to this blog? Like this or suscribe. In case you desire to damage my hp counter, you only have to comment in hate.

Note: I think Campbell’s book is worth reading. I’m only going to note that sometimes, I do need the «easy» version to compare*  When I was as doing the Yonseo English course online in Coursera, I was supposed to watch first the video to read the class document and answer five questions… All planned to be done in half an hour! I had to transcribe the document to my notebook (not that notebook, an analogue paper notebook by handwriting), answered the quiz and watched the video at the end so I could start to understand what was going on. Otherwise I wouldn’t start to fathom what was the class about…* to get things because I’m not as smart as I’d like to think. This is the «easy» version. The webinarist summarizes it  all in a bulleted version that’s a lot shorter… Yet, as Ikram Antaki said: nothing worth is ever easy. Not love nor culture. Nor writing.

Pasto kalo.


[1][1] It doesn’t matter how much English I could speak, my mind is tailored to units measured to the tenths. 95°F). Something the webinarist calls «believable» in the art of building walls or obstacles for our average Jane *As if the heroic exploits or fantasy heroes are not believable…

Categorías
Lunes de patchwork: SNS y escribir

Mommy sun