Etiqueta: How to write fiction

  • How to write fiction: imagenless guide

    writer working on typewriter in office
    Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

    LIMITED REALITY

                   Shall we stop being distracted with this question of History versus Story? We have the History in capital letters, busy with the domain of “real” events and the stories. Invented or imagined things that never happened, right?

                   Isaac Asimov said that the worth of a sci-fi plot is not the invented technology in it — as a matter of fact, it rarely undestands the new technology since they are not inventing it, they’re only imagining it[1]. According to him, its worth is to imagine the consequences of such technology in the future.

                    He referred to a tale in which a vehicle without horses was invented; causing jams in the not-projected-for-this-technology streets. Plus where to leave the vehicle when it wasn’t used, hadn’t being taken into account or the massive amount of the vehicles that would exist.

                   That’s right, we’re talking of the automobile. And the worth of the story goes in its ability to predict its social consequences. I mean, to suppose automobiles will cause traffic and there will never be enough parking lots to supply the demand.

    It is with this tiny example that I dare to say that fiction is real — within a set of limits (specifically, the imagination) —from a mental simulation of patterns, people, facts or desires.

    Real? Yes. If a story can’t be conceived as real within the simulation, it fails. Even the ones in a real place as stage, based upon the news or a serious historical novel; can only exist inside the frame of simulation or supposition. No one can 100% really  declare they know what was happening in Henry VIII’s head when he decided to become protestant —did he really only want to get a divorce from the ugly old wife? Not even looking at the documents or reading his diary (had he one?). Not even watching a video is 100% infallible, since it won’t show everything (remember there is a limited camera angle) and there are micro discrepancies of nanoseconds between what happens and what is being recorded. We can’t really declare a taken video is the absolute “reality”.

    A story is a game. A game in which we believe to the author.On the other side, how many times have we rejected a story we couldn’t deem ”believable”?  As something THAT doesn’t work as real within its frame. A story is a game. A game inside which we believe what the author says.

    When we were children we played. And we believed the small rock bundle a castle and the dog to our side the wolf to gulp us down. As adults we willingly submit ourselves to this game of reading/watching and think that what the author says is real (inside the simulation) When an author is incapable of making us to believe that what they say is true, our interest disappears regarding the story as a fake one. Don’t you read Dracula[2] believing the vampire truly exists? Once the book lies resting on the coffee table or the bookshelf, we go back to our everyday attitude of critical thinkers. At least I do, cause I like the supernatural as a nice idea of what is impossible.

    Next entries I will review:

    1. Understand the basic mistakes of fiction
    2. Prepare yourself to write fiction
    3. Write your fiction piece
    4. Review

    Today, this is it. To speak of History and reality have left me dust made. My hamster brain energically squeaks in protest because they’re doing extra time.

    Can you comment? Comments are the fuel to this blog!


    [1] New couple of words to differentiate….sigh.

    [2] In the original entry I mention The Dumas club by Perez Reverte to say we read it believing the devil exists to leave the book and go back to our atheist (I’m one) consciousness.

  • How to write fiction: imagenless guide

    writer working on typewriter in office
    Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.com

     Welcome to a cynical, pseudo-intellectual and… I’m out of adjectives, analysis. Anyways, welcome to this blog entry where I’ll tear apart… no, no really — some of the advice is good; a very well known and popular website on how to do stuff — without images. That if we don’t count the main image and… a good one Big Choma is lending me to illustrate one of the advice points.

    NOT TRUE OR NOT REAL

    The famous website starts by defining  fiction plots as not true or not real stories with true/real elements in them. Or as a tale from the author’s im

    agination with allusions to real people or events.  Then, I guess that before I confirm or refute anything, it becomes imperative to take out the Larousse … but this is the translated version thus it is a Merriam Webster what I’ll be taking out the bookshelf. And maybe adding what is written in the Larousse to compare. First the Larousse[1].

    Ficción. f. Creación de la imaginación: tu relato es una ficción. || Simulación.

    Fiction. Feminine. Creation of the imagination: your story is fiction. !!  Simulation.

    Imaginación. s. m. Del verbo imaginar.

    Imagination. masculine noun. From the verb to imagine.

    Imaginar. v. t. Representar idealmente una cosa, crearla con la mente. || Crear, inventar: imaginar un sistema de propulsión. || Pensar, suponer: imaginar lo que uno habrá dicho. || ~V. pr. Figurarse: se imaginó que era un sabio.

    Imagine. Transitive verb. To represent ideally a thing, to create it with the mind. !! To create, invent;  imagine a propelling system. !! To think, suppose, imagine what one could have said. !! ~pronominal verb. To figure out: he imagined he was a wise man.

    NOW THE MERRIAM WEBSTER

    Fiction noun fic·​tion ˈfik-shən

    1 a : something invented by the imagination or feigned, specifically : an invented story … I’d found out that the story of the ailing son was pure fiction.—Andrew A. Rooney

    b: fictitious literature (such as novels or short stories). She was renowned as a writer of fiction c : a work of fiction, especially : NOVEL Her latest work is a fiction set during the Civil War.

    2 a : an assumption of a possibility as a fact irrespective of the question of its truth, a legal fiction b : a useful illusion or pretense. It was only a fiction of independence his mother gave him; he was almost totally under her power—G. A. Wagner

    3: the action of feigning or of creating with the imagination. She engaged in fiction to escape painful realities.

    imagination noun imag·​i·​na·​tion i-ˌma-jə-ˈnā-shən

    1 : the act or power of forming a mental image of something not present to the senses or never before wholly perceived in reality

    2 a : creative ability b: ability to confront and deal with a problem : RESOURCEFULNESS use your imagination and get us out of here c : the thinking or active mind : INTEREST stories that fired the imagination

    3a: a creation of the mind, especially : an idealized or poetic creation

    b : fanciful or empty assumption 

    Imagine verb imag·​ine i-ˈma-jən  imagined; imagining i-ˈma-jə-niŋ  -ˈmaj-nə- transitive verb

    1: to form a mental image of (something not present). imagine accidents at every turn

    2: SUPPOSE, GUESS. I imagine it will rain

    3.: to form a notion of without sufficient basis : FANCY. imagines himself to be a charming conversationalist

    4 archaic : PLAN, SCHEME intransitive verb

    1: to use the imagination

    2: BELIEVE sense 3 : to hold an opinion               

    Summarising, we have two completely different things: reality and fiction. Which are, in fact, not as different as Hilary Mantel (historical novel writer) would say. After all, History is written by historians. And historians have their own likes and dislikes, interests and disinterests.

    They can perfectly omit half of the living population from the registry of provable and important facts since it does nothing more than… give birth[2].

    It might seem untrue, but along the 5,000 years or more of human history (written human history); women do nothing more than being pretty, give birth to kings, marry kings or seduce them. And such a concept is a bogus fiction. But it is also… HiStory[3].


    [1] My Spanish-Spanish mate undo hubbles of the speech.

    [2] Note this idea ain’t mine. I heard it in a podcast called 100 women. Women History Hour and it verses on how the few or non-existent female Historians has created this data lacking which reflects a historical biased vision of the world. What I’m doing, is borrowing it to demonstrate that to divide what is “imaginary” or “fictitious” from what is “real” is not as simple and can´t be done just by saying the process is OBVIOUS.  Reality is something we can discuss till we have no voice… I think. And considering I´m myself a woman, I should believe my feats as imaginary given this parameter of division.

    [3] In Spanish, both history and story are spelled the same, thus the word iron. English wouldn’t allow a plot or story to be the same as History; at least in its spelling.

  • The first manual in writing fiction that isn’t about writing fiction but about human myths: The hero with a thousand faces

    woman in white long sleeve clothing holding a sword
    Photo by Happy Pixels on Pexels.com

    It is a book. Yeah, sure. Any manual should be or at least be a bunch of stapled copies. Right?

    It is one of those books recommended by other authors in different places as a basic referral on how to write fiction. Robert McKee being one (and the only one I remember at this precise minute in spite of remembering vaguely it was mentioned related to the magical object given to the hero in some Google search).

    The thing, also recommended by marriage therapist psychologists[1] , was written by a said Joseph Campbell (who later founded a society under his name focused into the research of myths) and it is some kind of rustic divan session applied to different human myths and its structure. Why to read it and why not to read it? Books are double edged swords, aren’t they?

    CONS:

    • It speaks about the anxiety and problems akin to human beings before the digital revolution… According to Nuval Yoah Harariin “Homo Deus”: that what worried humans as species and takes them to get excited with stories like the Bible has changed. The worries of the species are different and much more individual than what they used to be.
    • But of course COVID 19, came to remember us some of those worries from ancient times (the plague, war and death). We haven’t changed to the point of speaking about millennials and z generation as if we’re talking of aliens. There is no way to really know if one belongs to this or that group when you’re in the border ages mentioned in definitions. And since definitions are anything but clear, it’s kinda preposterous to assume the average youngster will not worry about the meaning of life, their mortality and armed conflicts. Not to mention, the only ones obsessed with dividing people into these groups, Zweitgeist like style, are Caucasian.
    • Occasionally, the stories turn up being mystical since they speak about the psychological human relation to the universe through more elevated purposes.If the elevation depends on stairs or rockets, it beats me. I mean, they go on about the meaning of life. So to say so, it becomes a little bit religious instead of psychological and yet… That’s cause religions are some kind of human mind control which requires psychology.
    • It analyzes a bunch of stories so if you haven’t read them already, you might feel kinda ignorant or lost.

    PROS

    • It establishes a relationship myth (story) to the psychological need of the three most life passage ceremonies there are: birth, initiation to adulthood and dead. Which explains why Harry Potter is as popular. It is a hero that goes through all them (the last implies Voldemorth and his own death so he can be reborn into a normal human being again) thanks to parental love. This reality is taken into account in videogame design and other stories to get our empathy.

    • If like me, you’ve never assisted to any of the Ivy League schools and your education doesn’t include the classical Greeks or Latin ones; you will find (unfortunately incomplete or fragmented), some of the most basic morsels of classical literary education so you can look them up somewhere else. With a lot of brainy and wise opinions around the story body. Few times translated to Spanish or maybe I didn’t look them up sufficiently.
    • The list of the mentioned books comes around like the 100 books you gotta read before dying. Better said, it is an idea of how to start acquiring ideas and/or which kind of stories to look up as models in spite of their age.

    Are you reading it? Is there any other book with this kind of approach you know and can share with a review?

    Like, subscribe, share. Even if you diss me. Pasto kalo.


    [1] As single as I am, that doesn’t help me from getting to know stuff. No, the source is privately confidential since I’ve already forgotten their names.

  • How to write fiction creating 4 chasms between what’s wished for and the results

    brown rock formation
    Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

    Lucky Live (Lucas actually) decides to change and become a sensible sensitive man. He changes his bike for a bicycle so old it even has a grid to help ladies from getting their skirts stuck in the wheels. His hair is now long enough for a pony tail and he wears a second hand overall and stripped socks. Just the first day at school, Miss Piltz requests for a form to be signed by the parents. Lucky in his eagerness to be as transparent as possible…. Fills it himself under the teacher’s sight. His parents have given him and his best friend Ariadne (whom tells the story) some of these forms already signed as checks in blank; given that the two of them have proven to be sensible. Up to now. Lucas commits the treason of showing off this trust. Miss Piltz misunderstands it as forgery. Lucas is sent to the Principal’s. 

    To Robert McKee in “The script. Story”; there is always a chasm between the consequences of the actions of the actors (results) and what they expect to obtain from those (the intentions). According to him, you can get this chasm by continuously changing POV or perspectives in a way that every character’s reactions or perspective end up being more authentic and original due to the need to face each character’s fate. Once characters are contrasted against someone else’s reality; they will fail to obtain what they intend since the other character will always misunderstand and react accordingly. This creates chaos. And more abysms between the character’s intentions and the results open about their feet.

    This is the first abysm of fiction. The chasm between what the character does to obtain what they wish for and what they really get (very oftenly things go awry).

    Chuck Wendig recommends to “block” this path between the character and their wish, in a way that it is practically impossible for the character to obtain what he wishes for. Our “ant” character must encounter as much resistance as possible without the wish becoming totally impossible.

    It has to be almost impossible to obtain but only ALMOST. If the probabilities of getting the character’s wishes fulfilled are zero, our audience, will chose to abandon our alternate universe. In agreement, McKee explains that if the chances to get the wish fulfilled are null from the beginning, the audience will abandon the projection room without a second chance. 

    TO GET IT REQUIRES EXAGGERATING. Second chasm of fiction.

    Maybe I’m being too dramatic by calling it a chasm. Perhaps a crack. The point is that something shaped as a peculiar letter from a magic school instead of the usual invoice for your uncle arrives to the mail box… or it arrives directly into your hands. Sometimes some nightmare eaters decide that therapy isn’t for you, since they crave your nightmare for themselves. You must turn the ordinary into extraordinary. And still give room to the character to breath. They have to react properly. To just add and add happenings won’t create the third chasm. And the fourth divides good stories from master pieces.

    In my opinion (and some others too); these two are not the only abysms. In whatever alternate universe or reality of fiction we can look calmly, sometimes with delight, at some character dying. Maybe we will feel irated or a little sad but… We aren’t in need of years of grieving to get over the fact of such death.

    We will watch characters facing villains Kalashnikov in hand to defend democracy, free will and/or their best friend. This is the fun side of it.

    The chasm between our favourite sofá and the stress of wearing the character’s shoes.

    To jump from a moving train in the middle of a bridge when, at the same time, we move no muscle. We are happy and safe at home. I’m sure you have jumped off a swing in movement (no, not me, I’m a coward) and you felt exhilarated and adrenaline pumping. Would you jump off the train?

    Would you get out from your house, Wi-Fi supplied to get yourself into a bombing episode without a single bar in your smartphone? Would you drop your coffee mug to get yourself immersed in human disposal to greet your hero? Would you happily hire a music band to declare your love to your crush? I don’t know why, but this last one seems traumatic enough to add a layer of eccentricity given the odds of getting some “no thank you”.

    I remember an advertisement I watched in Sky which summarizes the idea perfectly. I don’t recall it verbatim and I didn’t have the wit to jot it down and we don’t have Sky here so I won’t quote. It was something alike:

    <<Do you wish for the excitement of fighting terrorists, assassin cruel villains and play with exotic weaponry at the comfort of your home? Watch these movies…>>

    Live and joy from the gut twist that fiction can get for you without risking your own skin in the front lines. Simple.

    The last chasm is the most difficult of them all. It is the abysm between what the reader wishes for/anticipates through the reading and what actually happens.

    Our experience (reader) against what the writer can do to enrich such experience with something different to a cliché.

    Has it happened to you? To watch Jurassic park and know, with certainty, that Blue will end up fighting the experimental dino. And before it even happens, you already know what is coming next.

    This a phenomenon linked to the happenings logic. An experienced reader (or film gourmet) knows where and when to anticipate what; just because they have watched or read their share. If they are not a writer themselves is only because they haven’t started to write anything. CAN YOU GIVE THEM WHAT THEY EXPECT WITHOUT GIVING IT AS THEY EXPECT IT?

    How would you create these abysms? No, don’t like it. Don’t subscribe. This blog is pure nonsense.

  • How to get rejected by any editor and 3 proposed chamomile tea ideas to avoid so

    a hand correcting some words on the document
    Photo by cottonbro on Pexels.com

    OK so from last week we learnt our poor editors and I’m not talking about free lance editors who will properly read you for the right amount, have a very close to stable manure moving lad life and can’t teach you how to organize your thoughts or think your selling strategies. That is something you will have to do on your own.

    So, how to fix your life regarding your hot burning desires to bring this baby you wrote to a publishing house?

    3 non related ways to writing that might get your book accepted:

    • Write full proposals. THE MORE COMPLETE, THE MORE PROBABLITIES YOUR JOB MIGHT JUMP FROM REJECTED TO READ. And in order to write full proposals you need to learn marketing.

    So learn marketing before you learn how to write.

    Start by lurking around the craft guilds in FB, IG, Twitter. And by craft guilds I mean groups who read and publish about your genre. Not sure what your genre is? Look at the tags of the things you read. What comes in is what comes out. So mine should be something like #supernatural comical romance. Which doesn’t exist. Does it?

    CHECK UP THE RESPONSABILITIES OF AN EDITOR IN LINKEDIN, CAREERBUILDER.COM OR ANGELIST or whatever job seeking app or website you know about.  

    If you can see and understand what they have to do, you might be able to learn and do.

    Everyday tasks are the most crucial abilities you need to pinpoint. So, when they come into your proposal they will see their job done. Which might help them to clothe themselves with the joy cape of the salesman. We need these people in our corners. A passionate salesman will close the deal. You might only… become nervous.

    • Your success is tied to the success of the editor. Hence, the editor NEEDS that you analyze and know inside-out the characteristics and benefits of the product (your book). In consequence, part of your job is to bring in buyers by having and maintaining selling vantage points as a blog, twitter, FB or IG with as many followers as you can bring in.

    This is an extra. If everything else fails… Become the next genius.

    As you can see, if besides writing like the gods you have to plan, execute and bring in the numbers why do we need publishing houses? Oh, right. Because they can pay for the advertising and we mostly can’t.

    Pasto kalo. Have the best week! Like, subscribe, comment and anything you need to increase

  • How to get rejected by any editor

    a hand correcting some words on the document
    Photo by cottonbro on Pexels.com

    For Mike Nappa[1] there are 77 reasons why your book was rejected. As a matter of fact he only uses that number for copywriting marketing reasons and the number of reasons presented in the aforementioned book are more. Among those reasons, the first one he uses is BECAUSE YOU DON’T WRITE WELL ENOUGH.

    In dirtier words “your writing smells like bullshit” Which can be or not, true. Regarding the effort invested in your writing. NONETHELESS the most important reason comes as the number 31.

    It has nothing to do with your writing. It is related to editorial work and you doing it instead of them.

    A reason good enough to be happier some spaces exist that have nothing to do with publishing houses. I mean, I know editors can do a good job at helping you reshaping your book but the kind of editors I’m talking about work for publishing houses. The big fish we’re supposed to strive to work with and admire.

    So, what’s not to do their job summarized and in a paraphrase (maybe a little… or a lot biased):

    This reason doesn’t go advertised since it might ruin the reputation of editors and literary agents. But as they’re already swamped or snowed under work, they don’t have the extra time. We need to appeal to them with EVERYTHING WE CAN TO PUSH THE BOOK IN FRONT OF THE PEOPLE WITH THE WALLET. After all, they deal with one or two petty cocky authors, hiring a conference room for a book presentation, answering dull e-mails, scavenging in book proposals… Come on, they don’t write like the gods for some obscure unknown reason. (Some of them do write but writing is not as profitable as being an editor it seems to me[2])

    Thus, a book proposal is judged mainly in the amount of work, the editor needs to add to his already sardine canned agenda.


    [1] Editor, copywriter and literary agent in Nappaland Literary Agency

    [2] Remember that this blog deals with nonsense so never take anything really serious. Unless you agree with me.

  • How to write fiction playing Scrabble

    I have work to do. I want to watch the YT video… (Yeah, me too). The day doesn’t last 32 hours. No human life is long enough. But… what about playing when the children are making a ruckus? Or on line, while you keep yourself away from a virus. To be scared of something killing so many people in so many strange ways, in a century that has no idea about the Spanish flu’s mortality rate or full scale war; is not embarrassing. Just take it easy, keep calm and admit you’re afraid so you won’t take any rash uninformed decision.

    So if you were to live somewhere with re-infection (I hope not in China) or that you have already started placing your finger on the clock’s biometric scan (Congraulations! Nonetheless, don’t greet anyone handshaking or kissing and go on with the mask’s use no matter how many around you have been vaccinated) or not currently working (company bankruptcy or whatever); that I suggest to play… It ain’t funny. Or attractive…

    But before we depres each other anymore… why top lay Scrabble as an idea sparker?

    1. Human mind works better when it plays. Not when you chase after a problem’s solution. Or, why does Google give so much importance to the laboral ambiance? Because when we’re doing nothing, that’s when inspiration comes ringing the door. So help your brain to get rid of the cobwebs and play for a while. It is much wiser than betting y even much better than drinking (note I’m not coercing you to stop drinking). Playing creates endorphins, it helps you relate better with people and in general, it distracts you.
    2. You can play it “open dictionary” mode (hontoni honto). This is included in the rules if you’re so kind to check it. It is ideal to be used with children and learn words together. It is better than school readings… I have seen them. Some are more boring than the Newspaper.
    3. Look at the image. A bit like Alarma newspaper, a Mexican tabloid which expertise is to cover front pages in petty graphic depictions of blood and violence. Yet, I think it is a good one (no, humbleness wasn’t invited to my party). It can become an idea sparkler. Like when someone is to rap and they have to put together all the words to make up a song. And it is different to electronic digital idea sparklers cause you’ll remember the fun. It can be used to draw comics if instead of writing, you draw an story using the words that come out in the game.
    4. Playing is the only thing which keeps brains young and sexy.

    Can you think some more reasons to play? Luke, subscribe, hate it, do whatever you want. Pasto kalo.

  • How to write fiction with a naturalist’s lifestyle

    There it is, small and black carrying a small crumb of cat’s dry food. Suddenly, they all come anf there’s a black moving line making up an antsy highway. You look at their lives, asking yourself if to brew a harsh war or let them live. However, your green army looks at you with a certain displeasure and… Of course, the dry food! So you decide to place the cat’s plate inside a bowl with water and place some chlorined cotton in their way.

    Gerry Durrell said a naturalist —what minute did naturalists became biologists the Charles Linnaeus of the world? — never gets bored. Some of reason he had. Though that depends on how much you hate grass and love asphalt. There’s nothing deadliest boring that looking and looking again at some bug or plant you have already looked at and looked all over again without nothing to happen in appearance.

    However, we aren’t here learning stuff about world’s bugs and relatives. You and I are chatting about the convenience of entering in possession of naturalist’s knowledge as material to tell or draw stories. And it doesn’t have to be underneath a cracking-stones-sun or the park. Either if we’re still safe bird boxed or already strolling around, we can become house bound naturalists.

    It can be at home with our little company animal (no, I’m not talking about your wife or husband no matter how much them resemble a gorilla sometimes). Describe what the cat does. It yawns, scratches without notice, meows in more than one tone to speak to you. My kid Dai likes speeches (of which I can’t get a meow) and can use more tones than Chinese. Plus, cats become kids-parents-friends-siblings; all at the same time and without asking, so they can do an assortment of strange things. Like bringing untailed lizards or half dried lizards. Or… bring you a pair of mice to be raised[1]. You can tell a story about when was the last time Kitty said “I love you” or how you fought for the chicken on the kitchen table. Or the punch they gave you unaware when playing.

    You don’t like cats and have a dog? Are you about to bite that pizza when Knine begs for a try?Can you resist its big aqueous eyes? If you own a dog I can bet you don’t. Equally difficult to ignore little Michi’s paws.

    The Fighter fish of the fish bowl… How does it sleep like? Does it float like a slumb or does it fall on the bottom? How does it move its fins? Does the turtle living in the bathroom bite? Do you have spiders on your drapes?

    Write or, draw. Even the smallest of pets has its own personality. Of course, if you work and work and never have time, we truly appreciate you staying away of having any baby who might miss you and end up high strung. Fish and insects might be your option then. Who doesn’t feel attracted to the fascinatingly disgusting eight legs of those furry creatures? …I can’t stand aracnophobia and every single creature bigger than two centimeters, legs included, had to be deported inside a cup. That nowadays I can see a black spider of about four centimeters doing her daily trip to the bathroom… I don’t want to think what’s hiding under the fabric in the closet…

    And, what about those immobile, unflinching and dull green beings? There are tons of books where they are mentioned cause their folklore uses[2]. To know them can help to add spice to your story as potion ingredients (garlic smashed with a silver knife…not unless it is a superb cooking additive).  

    If you happen to cook, you use herbs that for sure are already in a pot to make haste off its freshness. And if cooking books were to describe these plants as wines are described (woody, fruity, soft); the book might end up catching fire by itself. So sensual can these descriptions become. It tickles the end of the tongue and gums with a caress of breeze… peppermint. Plus, they are even more interesting than what they look like. Colours and textures that seem not to end ever.

    To finish this, I’ll recommend Desmond Morris: Watch your dog, Watch your cat; that might probably be a bit obsolete but are very useful for starters and take away prejudices. Among The naturalist’s guide by guess who? (Right! Gerald Durrell). Besides Dangerous garden by David C. Stuart.

    By the way, this last book is an essay about plants, the ways we relate to them and how we use those. It ain’t an erotic book at all. And I mention it only so you won’t end up disappointed by the title… as suggestive as it is and even more with the title they gave in Spanish El jardín de la tentación[3].

    So like, subscribe, describe your own naturalist’s experience or take a stroll… Visit the duckies or squirrels in the park and come back to tell us what they do afterwards.


    [1] I’m sorry to inform you that the mice died both very few days after the happening. I did what I could and cried the after match a lot so think whatever you want about me.

    [2] Most of the mentioned uses are either poisonous or their effects haven’t being proved by science since no scientific feels like getting themselves into trouble by discarding; chamomile for example, as an effective way to alleviate swelling.

    [3] The temptation garden as a direct translation.

  • How to write fiction, 10 ideas to unclogg the temporal writer’s block

    shallow focus photo of metal pipes on the wall
    Photo by Octoptimist on Pexels.com

    Panic not! And there’s panic already creeping up your leg since I had to go and open my big mouth… Easy. There are blog entries and videos to the brim about how to deal with writer’s block that for sure is the same for designers.

    And it is prone to happen; that from time to time and every other fortnight we run out of ideas. Usually at the beginning; when we’re still in lack of those muscles that get fatty after a year of pumping them. The writer/designer/drawer/engineer’s muscle which knows where is the IDEA and even smells it before it comes by. Or “in the half of the book” crisis or the “now what do I write?” crisis. 

    To us, the rookies (no matter how old we’re), it comes as being couch athletes. We can’t even get up to get ourselves a glass of water. O to go and write/design because anything else becomes more attractive than designing/writing/drawing/WORKING. No matter how hateful it is. Like taking an old t-shirt and clean around. I hate cleaning… but I clean when I should be writing!

    So long, do you wanna know how to focus and do what you must instead of counting reasons? First, a disclaimer. This blog entry is a mix of ideas by cathy Birch (The creative writer’s workbook), mine and someone else somewhere. The thing is, I don’t remember which is which. Thus, authorship is confusing, opaque and…let’s stop my mumbling.

    1. GET YOUR ARSE OUT FROM YOUR CHAIR. Stop looking at the blank page (either digital or real) and get your brain to do something else. We tend to obviate the familiar stuff and thus we take it for granted. Such an action takes us to make mistakes. It is better to look at it again from some other angle.
    2. Break the routine and do your eye gym ten minutes’ thing. You are not writing anything anyways, therefore you can distract yourself with something good for you health.
    3. No, in this blog I won’t promote suicide. Physcal exercise is good for your body but I won’t recommend you to do aerobic stuff or to jump anytime your health forbids so. Ypu can always look up any virtual walkout and simulate walking there or to find a YouTube video without jumping. The most demanding and at the same time easy to do activity is yoga. That some postures take too much on back, neck and knees is something you need to reckon before trying them. Always check with your physician before taking any new exercise routine if you’re with any cardiac, knee, spine or cholesterol problem.
    4. Clean. Mind’s webs disappear too by cleaning in real life. A dust free space is cleaner and healthier.
    5. Do you have children? Play! For sure they have less of these “inner judge” inhibitions and much more ideas than you do. Besides, children have a very thorough logic and see black and white things. This can help to re-think what you know about a topic. Does it embarrass you? I don’t see why. You’re telling a story and playing is to have Guinea pigs to your advantage to try how good a story is.
    6. GO GET YOURSELF A COFFEE/TEA/COCOA MUG. Cathy Birch says it is better to have wathever you might need hand reach and never waste time looking them up. However… if you’re already wasting time watching the blank of space, why not to give your brain a break? It can give it some fresh oxygen and an environment switch. Right. Don’t overeat. You will feel extra heavy and sleepy, more like napping than like placing your fingers over the keyboard. You will get fat… So what? An over weighted body feels like that.  Over weighted on the knees and on the legs. Gravity is more difficult to deal with to move it and cholesterol makes your muscles to produce lactic acid even quicker. Indeed, your choice.
    7. Change location. Under the table, in some other room, the bathroom, anywhere but move yourself. Quite impossible if you do drawing or #D design but… you can always take a notebook somewhere else. Don’t complaint and better think: How can I go to work to other place? Anyways, to think over and over the problem isn’t going to solve it any faster when you’re stuck.
    8. Do you feel pressured to increase productivity? Remember, we have been through quarantine. Some say they will never pay attention to such measurement again but even if we weren’t under such settings; you’re not under dead threat. Do what you can. Don’t hope for anything else.  As alcoholices do.  A day at a time, a page at a time. Keep your calm.
    9. Go napping. Yur brain needs to sleep too.
    10. If all the previous fail… GO BACK TO THE BEGINNING. Sometimes a faulty set up of the idea causes the flow to be obstructed and the story might not reach anywhere. If such is the case, START ALL OVER AGAIN.

    Up to here. Any additional idea you might have is cherised. ALONG comments. Like, suscribe, take a pause to recycle. Ciao, ciao.

  • How to write fiction without explaining…or maybe explaining

    man in blue dress shirt sitting beside woman in gray blazer
    Photo by cottonbro on Pexels.com

    How to write fiction without explaining…or maybe explaining

    Are movie scripts written the same way as a novel? Is it similar to create a comic to write a play script? Are all media written the same way?

    No…More or less. Novel, short stories, comics, movies, TV series, plays… We share this idea/will/purpose to tell something and doing it well. In an ENTERTAINING way and with a message. Something to keep our audience quiet, seated and enjoying. Add thinking (without them realizing).

    To the most, it is that all these media follow this one and seemingly only rule:

    “Show, don’t tell”.

    Robert McKee is one of those whose opinion is never to explain anything neither to think our audience is even more stupid than us. That we must obviate certain information. To be very careful in showing, not exposing. A rule that ends up being strange and very difficult to comply by. Why ?

    Let’s think together. Robert McKee talks about movie scripts not novels. What do movies do that novels don’t? Music, a camera which can be angled and tell us “Here is your heroe”, moving images. What do theatre plays have that comics don’t? Real time events, dialogues that can be used to hide information and a related stage limited budget…

    Obvi..ous? So long you have never tried to write anything, it is. The moment you decide to write something and fulfil the expectation of showing, not telling; you start to question how much of it is really obvious.

    Why does explaining become necessary in some cases?

    Corry L. Lee, the author of “Empire. Revolution. Magic”, mentions in Terriblemindshow thatwriters are warned not to expose but to show (repeatedly); when sometimes she considers explaining necessary. How magic does work for example. Since whenever you’re trying to create something that hasn’t been invented yet; there’s no ail but to explain. Traditional magic? You take out the magic wand, say a few words and voilá; magic system guaranteed. But, what happens if magic happens because of a virus? You take a breath and explain how it works… Based upon your expertise level.

    The more experienced you’re, the less you’ll have to explain anything cause you start to understand how to work out “SHOWING”. Showing is more taxing than explaining. Nonetheless, explaining also requires a certain level of ability. Not everyone can explain things in a comprehensible way. There are those whom being masters in Chemistry, have no idea how to explain why is it that water is a vital liquid.  Which is why if you’re barely starting, you might have to explain.

    Plus, explanations have the quick perk of giving context quickly. Terry Pratchett goes on to explain how the light in the Discworld happens to work so we understand how is it that a broom can go fly faster than light[1]… in two or three lines. There’s stuff you can’t simply show. However, you can’t just large a long explanation.

    In  “Katsuai Monster”, Narazaki Souta uses monologue to have us understand in less than a page why the main carácter has to “eat” bodily fluids (of all kind). Otherwise, she would have had to add more pages to show us. And adding pages is not precisely good whenever you’re page limited by format due to page imposition[2].

    Explanations are sorta like arrows in the map saying “YOU ARE HERE” to guide the reader through the most confusing parts.

    Recently, something happened about explanations to me. I had suppressed all explanations trying to “only show”. One of my friends told me the reading was confusing. And confusing is the one thing you can’t never afford when writing. Your writing has to be as clear as chicken broth since neither novels nor short stories have this “highlight” movies have. The one which shows you where is the important info…. To look down at reader’s intelligence is a world apart from being unclear about what we’re showing. 

    And, it could just be that movies, TV series, theater and very recently, digital comics; have music. Music is an ace under the sleeve to manipulate feelings. Robert Mckee oversees this fact. A more or less well planned scene can become a huge bomb just because of good music. I mean, imagine Shark without the tuntuntun tuntutun… The sound is more than enough to get goosebumps. And saves you from explaining. But books can’t have music… Fortunately!

    We need to be clever when reading writing manuals such as this one. Like, share, subscribe, etc.


    [1] Being concise, dawn’s light.

    [2] A way to match pages into an offset plate’s arrangement. Being offset a traditional printing system which requires a bigger amount of products being printed than the ones digital printing requires.